joshuaboniface/MTG-Variants
joshuaboniface
/
MTG-Variants
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Numerous rewording and formatting tweaks

This commit is contained in:
Joshua Boniface 2024-01-28 13:15:49 -05:00
parent d0750bac49
commit 83d390c750
1 changed files with 44 additions and 43 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

87
mtg-nicol-bolas-archenemy-reimagined.md
View File

@ -1,53 +1,55 @@
# Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined
Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined is a variant on the original Nicol Bolas, Archenemy, designed to solve some issues we noticed with the original product. This variant features 5 prebuilt, Commander/Oathbreaker-style decks, representing Nicol Bolas, the 3 original Gatewatch members from Nicol Bolas, Archenemy (Nissa Revane, Chandra Nalaar, and Gideon Jura), and Jace Beleren, along with some rules tweaks to help improve the variability of games.
*Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined* is a variant on the original *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy*, designed to solve some issues we noticed with the original product. This variant features 5 prebuilt, Commander/Oathbreaker-style decks, representing Nicol Bolas, the 3 original Gatewatch members from *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy* (Nissa Revane, Chandra Nalaar, and Gideon Jura), and Jace Beleren, along with some rules tweaks to help improve the variability of games.
#### Table of Contents
* [What Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined is trying to do](#what-nicol-bolas-archenemy-reimagined-is-trying-to-do)
* [What *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined* is trying to do](#what-nicol-bolas-archenemy-reimagined-is-trying-to-do)
* [Deck Construction Notes](#deck-construction-notes)
* [Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined Decklists](#nicol-bolas-archenemy-reimagined-decklists)
* [How To Play Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined](#how-to-play-nicol-bolas-archenemy-reimagined)
* [*Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined* Decklists](#nicol-bolas-archenemy-reimagined-decklists)
* [How To Play *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined* (rules tweaks)](#how-to-play-nicol-bolas-archenemy-reimagined)
## What Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined is trying to do
## What *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined* is trying to do
After playing the original product several times, we found several glaring issues with it:
After playing the original *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy* several times in our playgroup, we found several glaring issues with it:
* There was far too much variance with the Bolas deck, often getting mana-flooded or, paradoxically, mana-screwed. This made playing the deck frustrating.
* The deck based way too much on the Schemes; unless those went off in the right way, the deck was quite weak.
* The first two added up to mean that, out of 7 total completed games played, Bolas lost every time, with about as many scoops due to an obvious incoming loss. While that has a certain flavour ring, the product was reflecting the early parts of the War of the Spark storyline where Bolas *won* consistently, so this felt off, and was of course quite unfun to play as a result.
* The Gatewatch decks weren't swingy *enough*. After 6-7 turns they were able to consistently mow down anything the Bolas deck did even in the face of Schemes and big pain cards like Cruel Ultimatum. We wanted to power these down slightly to provide a bit more variance especially into the late-game.
* The deck based way too much on the Schemes; unless those went off in just the right way, the deck was quite weak.
* With those first two issues, out of 7 completed games played, Bolas lost every time, with about as many scoops due to an obvious incoming loss. While that has a certain flavour ring, the product was reflecting the early parts of the War of the Spark storyline where Bolas *won* consistently, so this felt off, and was of course quite unfun to play as a result.
* The Gatewatch decks weren't swingy *enough*. After 6-7 turns they were able to consistently mow down anything the Bolas deck did, even in the face of Schemes and big pain cards like `Cruel Ultimatum` or `Nicol Bolas, Planeswalker`. We wanted to power these down slightly to provide a bit more variance especially into the late-game.
* The games were really short, barring long decision-making sessions among the Gatewatch: games rarely went longer than 8-9 turns before an obvious conclusion was inevitable (invariably, Bolas losing).
Additionally, there were some aspects that weren't exactly issues, but that we wanted to change:
* We wanted to expand towards the later part of the Bolas Arc, specifically the War of the Spark itself. Combined with the repowering of the decks, we felt like this would be a major flavour win, as we could decide the outcome of his entire plan with the game as well as add some more cool things.
* We really wanted Bolas to be commanding the Dreadhorde here, with much more of a Zombie/Amass theme and adding Liliana to his deck.
* We wanted the ability to mix-and-match Gatewatch members in a more consistent way to allow either more players in one game, or more variety between games (how would Bolas fare against, say, Gideon, Chandra and Jace? Or Jace, Nissa, and Chandra, etc.).
* We wanted a Commander-like deck structure. Not just for the singleton aspect, but also for the ability to repeatedly bring out the key Planeswalkers over a longer game.
* We really wanted Bolas to be commanding the Dreadhorde here, with much more of a Zombie/Amass theme and adding Liliana to his deck to represent her turning by Bolas at the climax of the story.
* We wanted the ability to mix-and-match some more Gatewatch members to allow either more players in one game, or more variety between games; at the very least, we wanted Jace as a playable deck too.
* We wanted a Commander-like deck structure; not just for the singleton aspect, but also for the ability to repeatedly bring out the key Planeswalkers over a longer game. Also, given Wizards of the Coast's move in the last ~6 years towards extensive Commander support, we felt this is more like how the product would look if produced "today".
Thus, Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined is a complete "product" like the original; it features the 5 aforementioned decks, along with a Scheme deck for Bolas. The Scheme deck is unchanged from the original, but all 5 player decks are newly designed, while including all cards that were present in the original decks where applicable.
Thus, *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined* is a complete "product" like the original *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy*. The Scheme deck is unchanged from the original, and all 5 player decks are newly designed, while including all cards that were present in the original decks where applicable for flavour reasons and to assist in deckbuilding.
Future iterations might add more Gatewatch decks (on the shortlist are Ajani Goldmane, Kaya Cassir, and Teferi Akosa), but for now we feel that 5 decks (one more than the original *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy*) is enough and that those 3 planeswalkers would overlap a little too much (with all of them featuring White mana and, at least for Ajani, a major overlap with Gideon).
## Deck Construction Notes
In terms of the decks, this is a Commander-*like* format, but more like Oathbreaker-with-Commander-decks. Specifically:
In terms of the decks, this is a hybrid between Commander and Oathbreaker:
* The decks are all 100-card singleton.
* The Commanders of all 5 decks are the Planeswalkers those decks represent. All normal Commander/Oathbreaker rules apply regarding them. The planeswalkers represent the best functional version of the planeswalker, not necessarily the most story-accurate version or version from the original decks (e.g. we use the Amonkhet Nissa for her blue and green mana, and Gideon for his soldier aspects, but the Core Set 2020 Chandra as it fits her deck better).
* There is no Commander Damage rule; any damage dealt by the Commander Planeswalkers is treated as normal damage.
* The Commanders of all 5 decks are the Planeswalkers those decks represent. All normal Commander/Oathbreaker rules apply regarding them ("Commander tax" of `{2}` per cast, always returning to the Command zone, etc.).
* The chosen Planeswalker cards represent the best functional version of the Planeswalker, not necessarily the most story-accurate version or version from the original decks (e.g. we use the Amonkhet Nissa for her blue and green mana, and Gideon for his soldier aspects, but the Core Set 2020 Chandra as it fits her deck better).
* There is no Commander Damage rule; any damage dealt by the Commander Planeswalkers is treated as normal damage, since this would only really apply to Chandra and Gideon and would be anti-climactic.
* Each Gatewatch deck is limited to a single Planeswalker card, their Commander.
* Bolas's deck features one additional Planeswalker, Liliana, Dreadhorde Commander, as a secondary commander; both are in the command zone and may be cast in any order.
* Each *Gatewatch* deck has that planeswalker's cooresponding Gatewatch Oath card as a "signature spell"; Bolas does not get a signature spell like this, as his Schemes represent that idea.
* The Oaths follow slightly tweaked "signature spell" rules:
* The player may cast their Oath at any time from the command zone, regardless of whether they control their Commander or not (which, given the abilities of the Oaths, is quite critical). [Change from normal Oathbreaker]
* If the Oath would leave the battlefield, it instead returns to the command zone. [Same as normal Oathbreaker]
* The Oath costs {2} more to cast for each time it has been previously cast this game. [Same as normal Oathbreaker]
* Each Gatewatch deck has that Planeswalker's coresponding Gatewatch Oath card as a "signature spell" as in Oathbreaker; Bolas does not get a signature spell like this, as his Schemes represent that idea.
* The Gatewatch Oaths follow the normal Oathbreaker "signature spell" rules (identical in effect to the Commander card rules), with one change:
* A player may cast their Gatewatch Oath at any time from the command zone, regardless of whether they control their Commander or not.
Given the abilities of the Gatewatch Oaths, this is quite critical.
* Each deck features 2 additional Legendary creatures as "lieutenants" within the deck (not command zone), representing key allies that help define the deck and provide strong synergies. For Bolas, these are two of his dead gods; for the Gatewatch, they are on-flavour friends and allies that have come to assist.
* The decks, and specifically the 3-colour Bolas and 2-colour Nissa decks, feature a fairly expensive manabase. This was a conscious decision to ensure optimal mana is avaiable and avoid a key problem mentioned above, since losing because you couldn't play your spells is never fun. But we recognize that this might be overly prohibitive to people wishing to craft these decks. There are two options here:
1. Depower the manabases, replacing the original duals, shocks, and fetches with more modern, slower multicolour lands and basics. This would hurt the Bolas deck much more so than the Nissa deck, but would be doable. Personally, we do not like things such as the MDFC land cycles due to the actual act of flipping them and such, but there are viable options like that.
2. Proxy the expensive cards. This is the solution we have chosen for our playgroup, as we are firm believers in "Magic should be *played* and the cards exist somewhere, so use them however we can". You may disagree with this philosophy and that's fine, but we built around it.
Yes, this means the decks as-is would never see print, even beyond just the Reserve List cards, but that is after all part of the point of "reimagining" them.
* The original Oath of Nissa card has a second ability ("use mana as if it was any colour to cast planeswalkers") that is functionally useless in her deck and this format, since each deck features only a single planeswalker and the deck is forced into those colours with a good dual-colour manabase. Instead, this variant uses [a new, custom Oath of Nissa card to compensate](images/nissas-new-oath.png).
* The original `Oath of Nissa` card has a second ability ("use mana as if it was any colour to cast a planeswalker") that is functionally useless in her deck and this format, since each deck features only a single Planeswalker and the deck is already in her colours with a good dual-colour manabase. Instead, this variant uses [a new, custom `Oath of Nissa` card to compensate](images/nissas-new-oath.png) for the Nissa deck's Gatewatch Oath:
```
Oath of Nissa {G}{G}
Legendary Enchantment
@ -55,11 +57,27 @@ In terms of the decks, this is a Commander-*like* format, but more like Oathbrea
Whenever a planeswalker enters the battlefield under your control, you may play an additional land this turn.
```
The new version keeps the first ability of the original as-is, changes the second ability to be an extra land drop whenever a planeswalker (i.e. Nissa) enters the battlefield, and increases the cost to {G}{G} to compensate for the slightly increased power here (comparable to Explore). Since we decided to proxy chunks of the decks anyways, this was a trivial change for us, but you can choose not to use it should you wish; that said, we feel it helps keep parity between the 4 Gatewatch decks and avoids a feel-bad moment when the Nissa player realizes her Oath has no functional planeswalker-enters ability like the others have. If we were WotC, we'd very likely make an entirely new cycle for this purpose, but since we're not, we felt keeping the change as small as possible was important.
The new version keeps the first ability of the original as-is, changes the second ability to be an extra land drop whenever a Planeswalker (i.e. Nissa) enters the battlefield, and increases the cost to `{G}{G}` to compensate for the slightly increased power here (comparable to Explore). Since we decided to proxy chunks of the decks anyways, this was a trivial change for us, but you can choose not to use it should you wish; that said, we feel it helps keep parity between the 4 Gatewatch decks and avoids a feel-bad moment when the Nissa player realizes her Gatewatch Oath has no functional Planeswalker-enters ability like the others have. If we were Wizards of the Coast, we'd very likely just make an entirely new cycle for this purpose, but since we're not, we felt keeping the change as small as possible was important. This may change should the variant evolve over time, but right now the original `Oath of X` cards, along with this tweaked Nissa version, feel on-flavour and at a good power balance.
## Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined Decklists
## How To Play *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined*
All decklists are in [this folder](https://archidekt.com/folders/528425) for possible future additions.
In terms of actual gameplay, there is one major change and one minor change from the original *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy*. The larger change is to provide consistent life totals for the larger decks and slower format; the small change gives Nicol Bolas a special ability when he is close to death:
1. For life totals, first pick a Gatewatch life total; this could be either 20 (same as the original *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy*), 30 or 40. Pick higher values for fewer Gatewatch members or for longer games with more players, or lower values for more Gatewatch members or quicker games. Each Gatewatch member starts with this life total.
2. Nicol Bolas starts with the same life total as the Gatewatch, plus an additional 10 life for each Gatewatch member. For example, a 3-vs-1 with 40 Gatewatch life means Bolas starts with 70 life (`40 + (10 * 3)`), or a 4-vs-1 with 20 Gatewatch life means Bolas starts with 60 life (`20 + (10 * 4)`). This should give him the life edge he deserves, while preventing the game from going on too long, and avoids the potentially unfair imbalance inherent to a simple doubling of the Gatewatch life for Bolas (i.e. having the same life total in both a 2-vs-1 and a 4-vs-1, the former benefiting Bolas too much and the latter benefiting the Gatewatch too much).
3. Nicol Bolas has an optional (rule 0) special ability, useful when he's at less than 10 life, designed to represent his ruthless last-ditch efforts to turn the tide and stave off defeat:
```
As long as your life total is less than 10, planeswalker spells you cast cost {X} less to cast, where X is 10 minus your life total.
```
Thus for example, if Bolas is at 5 life, his Commanders each cost `{5}` less to cast; so ignoring the possible Commander tax, Bolas himself would cost `{U}{G}{R}` and Liliana would cost `{B}{B}` in that situation.
It probably won't help that much in most games, but we felt it was very flavourful, giving the player one last chance to make an impact with the Commanders before defeat and possibly still being able to cast other spells on that, likely last, turn.
All other gameplay rules from *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy* are left unchanged: the shared Gatewatch team turn, cross-blockers, Schemes, Archenemy-goes-first, etc. all apply.
## *Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined* Decklists
All decklists are in [this Archidekt folder](https://archidekt.com/folders/528425) for possible future additions.
### [Archenemy - Nicol Bolas](https://archidekt.com/decks/6544225) (includes Schemes)
@ -81,7 +99,7 @@ Lieutenants:
Nissa Revane: Life mage, elf, lover of forests and the elements. This deck is designed to reflect Nissa's land-, elf-, and elemental-focused nature, featuring elves and elementals and a major land-awakening theme to crush your enemy under the very land itself.
NOTE: This deck features a custom Oath of Nissa card to better complement the deck and format. For details please see above.
NOTE: This deck features a custom `Oath of Nissa` card to better complement the deck and format. For details please see above.
Commanders:
* Nissa, Steward of Elements
@ -132,20 +150,3 @@ Commanders:
Lieutenants:
* Alandra, Sky Dreamer
* Deekah, Fractal Theorist
## How To Play Nicol Bolas, Archenemy: Reimagined
In terms of actual gameplay, there is only one major change from the original product: the starting life totals. To provide a longer and more varied game experience, the following rules apply:
1. Pick a Gatewatch member life total; this could be either 20, 30 or 40. Pick higher values for fewer Gatewatch members or for longer games with more players; pick lower values for more Gatewatch members or quicker games. Each Gatewatch member starts with this life total.
2. Nicol Bolas starts with the same life total as the Gatewatch, plus an additional 10 life for each Gatewatch member. For example, 3-vs-1 with 40 starting means Bolas starts with `40 + (10 * 3) = 70` life, or a 4-vs-1 with 20 starting means Bolas starts with `20 + (10 * 4) = 60` life. This should give him the life edge he deserves, while preventing the game from going on too long or providing a major disadvantage to either side.
3. Nicol Bolas also has a special optional (still being playtested) ability, useful when he's at less than 10 life, designed to represent his ruthless last-ditch efforts to turn the tide and stave off defeat:
```
As long as your life total is less than 10, Planeswalker cards you cast cost {X} less to cast, where X is 10 minus your life total.
```
Thus for example, if Bolas is at 5 life, his Commanders each cost {5} less to cast (ignoring the possible Commander tax, making Bolas himself cost {U}{G}{R} and Liliana cost {B}{B}).
It probably won't help that much in most games, but we felt it was very flavourful, giving the player one last chance to make an impact with the Commanders before defeat.
All other gameplay rules from Nicol Bolas, Archenemy apply (shared Gatewatch team turn, cross-blockers, Schemes, Archenemy-goes-first, etc.).