This commit is contained in:
Joshua Boniface 2018-06-18 21:35:45 -04:00
parent c07c67e4dd
commit b6700b5110
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ In short, PVC does not look to replace large projects like OpenStack, only a par
1. You have a small (3+ node) KVM cluster and want to efficiently manage your VMs via CLI. 1. You have a small (3+ node) KVM cluster and want to efficiently manage your VMs via CLI.
2. You need a very scalable solution to manage dozens of KVM hypervisors. 2. You need a very scalable solution to manage dozens of KVM hypervisors.
Really, PVC bennefits both the small and large usecases. Really, PVC benefits both the small and large use-cases. If your requirement is for a simple and easy-to-use tool to automatically manage VMs, PVC will work for you.
## Why shouldn't you use PVC? ## Why shouldn't you use PVC?