diff --git a/content/2.md b/content/2.md
index 3910985..97820da 100644
--- a/content/2.md
+++ b/content/2.md
@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ Having a number of disks in RAID may **seem** like a backup, especially if you'r
 
 RAID protects you against one and only one thing: a disk failure. It does **not** protect you against any of the following things:
 
-  1. Multiple disk failures beyond the RAID level chosen (e.g. both disks in a mirror, or 3 disks in a RAID-6).
-  2. Failure of the RAID controller itself (especially when using hardware RAID), the computer itself, or the environment (a flood, or fire, perhaps).
-  3. Data corruption on-disk (except for ZFS, and especially for BTRFS) from cosmic rays, or minor hardware or firmware failures.
-  4. File corruption from bad writes or bit rot (except for ZFS), including whole-volume corruption from administrative mistakes (e.g. =mkfs= on an existing filesystem).
-  5. Malicious or accidental deletion or modification of data by yourself or another party, including viruses.
+* Multiple disk failures beyond the RAID level chosen (e.g. both disks in a mirror, or 3 disks in a RAID-6).
+* Failure of the RAID controller itself (especially when using hardware RAID), the computer itself, or the environment (a flood, or fire, perhaps).
+* Data corruption on-disk (except for ZFS, and especially for BTRFS) from cosmic rays, or minor hardware or firmware failures.
+* File corruption from bad writes or bit rot (except for ZFS), including whole-volume corruption from administrative mistakes (e.g. =mkfs= on an existing filesystem).
+* Malicious or accidental deletion or modification of data by yourself or another party, including viruses.
 
 The adage is simple: "RAID replicates **everything**, even the stuff you don't want, like the deletion of that file you needed."